Environmental Protections Could Be in Danger With Trump’s SCOTUS Pick  

Amy Coney Barrett’s Pro-Corporate Record in Line with Trump’s Industry Allyship 


HELENA, MT – This past weekend, President Trump officially nominated Amy Coney Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme CourtSince Barrett has only been a federal judge since 2017, not much is known yet about her environmental recordBut from her views on corporations to women’s reproductive rights and health care, it’s fair to call her a devotee of the late Justice Antonin Scaliafor whom she clerked in the late 1990s  far from a pro-environmental champion. 

With Amy Coney Barrett’s history of repeatedly siding with corporate interests over people, all signs point to her putting Trump’s personal agenda ahead of the health and safety of Americans and the nation’s public lands,” said Western Values Project director Jayson O’Neill. “Trump has already rolled back a historic number of essential public land and environmental protections  earning him the dubious record of being the worst public lands and environmental President in history. But if Barrett is confirmed to the high court, Trump’s actions could be upheldenshrining a lasting threat to our nation’s public lands and environmental well-being.  

New findings by government watchdog Accountable.US show that in her time serving on the 7th Circuit, Barrett ruled with corporate interests over people 76% of the time. And with Trump’s history endangering western lands to promotthe oil and coal industrieshis choice to tap Barrett is of little surprise.  

Here is a look at a few of Barrett’s previous anti-environmental judicial rulings: 

If confirmed, it is likely that Barrett will continue her proven pattern of siding with corporate interests and work to overturn Obama-era environmental protections that the Trump administration has been so adamant about erasing, including addressing the climate crisis already ravaging the nation. 


Join the effort to strengthen the American West.